Re: [GENERAL] Postgres 10.1 fails to start: server did not start in time - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Postgres 10.1 fails to start: server did not start in time
Date
Msg-id 10500.1510349357@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Postgres 10.1 fails to start: server did not start in time  (Adam Brusselback <adambrusselback@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Adam Brusselback <adambrusselback@gmail.com> writes:
>> You might want to increase pg_ctl's wait timeout for this situation,
>> since the default's evidently too little.  However ...

> Got it, thanks.

>> ... pg_ctl itself wouldn't decide to forcibly shut down the server
>> if the timeout expired.  It merely stops waiting and tells you so.
>> It seems like this must represent misdesign of whatever start script
>> you're using.  I think you need to complain to the Debian packagers
>> about that.

> Hmm, interesting.  I installed from this repo:
> http://apt.postgresql.org/pub/repos/apt/ stretch-pgdg main
> I was assuming someone in the Postgres project was involved in
> packaging it.  Do you know who I should reach out to in that case?

Christoph's probably a good place to start.
        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgres 10.1 fails to start: server did not start intime
Next
From: DrakoRod
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Because PostgreSQL is compiling in old versions of OS?