Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Neil Conway
Subject Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
Date
Msg-id 1047958818.19380.13.camel@tokyo
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 20:48, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > If we do this, could we get rid of the messy autocommit GUC option and
> > handle autocommit in the client?
> 
> Hmm ... that's a thought ... not very backwards-compatible with 7.3,
> but I think I like it better than continuing on with the GUC option.
> As you say, that path is looking messier all the time.

Yes, definitely -- replacing the 7.3 GUC option would be great, that's a
pretty bad hack IMHO.

Cheers,

Neil

-- 
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: cursors outside transactions
Next
From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Date:
Subject: Little problem with tsearch