Re: new format for describe (repost #2) - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Rod Taylor
Subject Re: new format for describe (repost #2)
Date
Msg-id 1046993804.487.89.camel@jester
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: new format for describe (repost #2)  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-patches
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 18:07, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne writes:
>
> > I mean, what's easier to read at a glance:
> >
> > "$1" FOREIGN KEY (referrer) REFERENCES users_users(userid) ON DELETE SET
> > NULL
> >
> > or
> >
> > >  Foreign Keys
> > >  Name | Referencing Col | Referenced Tbl | Referenced Col | Delete Action
> > > ------+-----------------+----------------+----------------+---------------
> > ...
> > >  $1   | referrer        | users_users    | userid         | SET NULL
>
> The second.

Really?  The name is easier to pick out, but other than that....

I guess it's what you're used to looking at.

--
Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>

PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc

Attachment

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: new format for describe (repost #2)
Next
From: Kevin Brown
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] stats_command_string default?