Re: new --maintenance-db options - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: new --maintenance-db options
Date
Msg-id 10448.1345728983@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: new --maintenance-db options  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 01:26 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> About the new --maintenance-db options:
>> 
>> Why was this option not added to createuser and dropuser?  In the
>> original discussion[0] they were mentioned, but it apparently never
>> made it into the code. 

> What should we do with this?  Add the option to createuser and dropuser
> now, and think about a more permanent/useful/complete solution in 9.3?

IMO it is now too late for 9.2 ... especially if you're of the opinion
that the current design is bad.  Propagating a wrong choice into even
more places doesn't seem like a step forward.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: xlog file naming
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: to_timestamp() too loose?