Re: Recursive unions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hannu Krosing
Subject Re: Recursive unions
Date
Msg-id 1043875633.1611.4.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Recursive unions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Recursive unions
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane kirjutas K, 29.01.2003 kell 17:58:
> "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> > What was the result of the recursive unions thread?  I remember Tom maybe
> > saying that the Redhat guys like the DB2 (SQL99) syntax the best, however
> > was it said that that was going to be done by Redhat for 7.4?
> 
> It'll be looked at; whether it will be done in time for 7.4 is anyone's guess.

Is anyone actually working on it ?

I had some work on it done in this direction for 7.2.x (yacc patches up
to parse tree generation).

If nobody is currently doing it, I would start pushing it by bringing my
work to 7.4 and then doing small amounts of work and then bugging the
list about what would be the best ways to continue, repeating it until
it is done ;)

-- 
Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Dann Corbit"
Date:
Subject: Re: Win32 port patches submitted
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Recursive unions