> While I haven't thought about it very hard, it seems to me that a role
> might be equivalent or nearly so to a group. If so, we might be able
> to support roles with little more than some syntactic-sugar work ...
A few other changes, like allowing ownership of an object to be a group
(role) rather than strictly a user.
--
Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>
PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc
