Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements
Date
Msg-id 1040162.1623959602@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> Phew. Do we really want to break a quite significant number of
> extensions this long after feature freeze? Since we already need to find
> a backpatchable way to deal with the issue it seems like deferring the
> API change to 15 might be prudent?

Uh, nobody ever promised that server-internal APIs are frozen as of beta1;
that would be a horrid crimp on our ability to fix bugs during beta.
I've generally supposed that we don't start expecting that till RC stage.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Add version macro to libpq-fe.h
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Add version macro to libpq-fe.h