Re: Big 7.4 items - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Neil Conway
Subject Re: Big 7.4 items
Date
Msg-id 1039841409.2629.18.camel@tokyo
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Big 7.4 items  ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
Responses Re: Big 7.4 items
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 20:20, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > This is a good point.  I don't want to push Postgres-R as our solution.
> > Rather, I have looked at both and like Postgres-R, but others need to
> > look at both and decide so we are all in agreement when we move forward.
> 
> I think in either way, it's clear that they need to be in the main CVS, in
> order for it to get up to speed.

Why's that?

Cheers,

Neil
-- 
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: Big 7.4 items
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken?