Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes:
> that seems entirely doable with our current infrastructure (and even
> with minimal-to-no hackery on mj2) - but it still carries the "changes
> From:" issue :/
Yeah. What do you think of the other approach of trying to preserve
validity of the incoming DKIM-Signature (in particular, by not changing
the Subject or message body)?
regards, tom lane
