Re: Sequence Start number not dumped correctly - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Reto Stamm
Subject Re: Sequence Start number not dumped correctly
Date
Msg-id 1036695385.3dcab759e9eff@webmail.spamcop.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Sequence Start number not dumped correctly  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
Hello Tom,

I am sorry, I can not reproduce it any more either. I must have made a mistake.

It works perfectly (like the rest of Postgres). Thank you very much, I am sorry
for the waste of time.

Best regards

--reto

Quoting Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:

> Reto Stamm <reto@retostamm.com> writes:
> > When I have a sequence like this:
> > CREATE SEQUENCE "test_id_seq" start -32768 increment 1 maxvalue 32767
> minvalue
> > -32768 cache 1;
>
> > it will show up in schema.txt like this:
>
> > CREATE SEQUENCE "test_id_seq" start 1 increment 1 maxvalue 32767 minvalue
> -32768
> > cache 1;
>
> How old is your Postgres?  It works here.
>
> But note that there is probably also a select setval() for the sequence,
> which is what *really* determines the starting value.
>
>             regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Fabien Fischer
Date:
Subject: I can't start postgres anymore
Next
From: Mats Lofkvist
Date:
Subject: JDBC access broken in 7.3 beta