Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly?
Date
Msg-id 10362.1160664260@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly?  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net>)
Responses Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly?  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net>)
Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly?  (Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>)
Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly?  (Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>)
List pgsql-performance
"Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net> writes:
> If someone's going to commit to putting effort into improving the
> planner then that's wonderful. But I can't recall any significant
> planner improvements since min/max (which I'd argue was more of a bug
> fix than an improvement).

Hmph.  Apparently I've wasted most of the last five years.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly?
Next
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Hints proposal