Re: 7.2.3 vacuum bug - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Rod Taylor
Subject Re: 7.2.3 vacuum bug
Date
Msg-id 1036086999.94263.32.camel@jester
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 7.2.3 vacuum bug  ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>)
Responses Re: 7.2.3 vacuum bug  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Found another:

ERROR:  cannot find attribute 2 of relation pg_temp_12100_0

On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 11:33, scott.marlowe wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> > Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
> > > Ok, fair enough -- I agree that we should treat the two cases
> > > differently. But one thing I think we should do in any case is improve
> > > the wording of the error message.
> > 
> > Got a suggestion?
> 
> Change:  RelationClearRelation: relation 25172 deleted while still in use
> to: RelationClearRelation: a relation (id: 25172) was deleted while still 
> in use
> 
> 
--  Rod Taylor



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Barry Lind
Date:
Subject: Re: PG functions in Java: maybe use gcj?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: float output precision questions