Re: Replication slot stats misgivings - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Replication slot stats misgivings
Date
Msg-id 1035337.1620793743@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Replication slot stats misgivings  (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Replication slot stats misgivings
List pgsql-hackers
vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> writes:
> I agree with your analysis to remove that test. Attached patch has the
> changes for the same.

Is there any value in converting the test case into a TAP test that
could be more flexible about the expected output?  I'm mainly wondering
whether there are any code paths that this test forces the server through,
which would otherwise lack coverage.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: Replication slot stats misgivings
Next
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: Replication slot stats misgivings