On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 05:22, Gavin Sherry wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm thinking that there is an improvement to vacuum which could be made
> for 7.4. VACUUM FULLing large, heavily updated tables is a pain. There's
> very little an application can do to minimise dead-tuples, particularly if
> the table is randomly updated. Wouldn't it be beneficial if VACUUM could
> have a parameter which specified how much of the table is vacuumed. That
> is, you could specify:
>
> VACUUM FULL test 20 precent;
What about
VACUUM FULL test WORK 5 SLEEP 50;
meaning to VACUUM FULL the whole table, but to work in small chunks and
relaese all locks and let others access the tables between these ?
You could even fire up a separate thread to
VACUUM [FULL] test WORK 5 SLEEP 50 CONTINUOUS;
To keep vacuuming a heavily updated table.
------------------
Hannu
