Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Copeland
Subject Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes
Date
Msg-id 1033947313.14317.42.camel@mouse.copelandconsulting.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes  (Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 2002-10-06 at 18:07, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> CPU loading goes from 80% idle at 1 client to 50% idle at 5 clients
> to <10% idle at 10 or more.
>
> So this does seem to be a nice win, and unless I hear objections
> I will apply it ...
>

Wow Tom!  That's wonderful!  On the other hand, maybe people needed the
extra idle CPU time that was provided by the unpatched code.  ;)

Greg


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes
Next
From: Rod Taylor
Date:
Subject: Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes