Nic,
send the patch as a context diff
Dave
On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 19:33, Nic Ferrier wrote:
> I'm another one of those refugees from oracle who like to return
> cursors from stored procs.
>
> I was getting annoyed at PostgreSQL's solution, which seems to be
> less elegant than Oracle's, so I've added code to the JDBC driver to
> implement the same solution as is possible with Oracle.
>
> In brief, getting a returned cursor can now be done like this:
>
>
> Statement st = con.createStatement();
> // Has to be done within a single transaction.
> con.setAutoCommit(false);
> ResultSet rs
> = st.executeQuery("select some_func_returning_refcursor();");
> if (! rs.next())
> throw new SQLException("whoops! there were no rows.");
> try
> {
> ResultSet v = (ResultSet) rs.getObject(1);
> while (rs2.next())
> System.out.println(rs2.getString(1));
> }
> catch (Exception e)
> {
> System.out.println(e.getMessage());
> }
> // This causes the refcursor to be closed.
> con.commit();
> st.close();
>
>
> The change wasn't difficult to make, it's a few changes but mainly
> it's not much more than this:
>
> else if (type.equals("refcursor"))
> {
> String cursorName = getString(columnIndex);
> Statement st = new Statement(this.statement.connection);
> return st.executeQuery("FETCH ALL IN \""
> + cursorName
> + "\";");
> }
>
> in the default handling for the JDBC type in the jdbc2/ResultSet
> class.
>
>
> Would a diff for the patch be appreciated here? If so, what sort of
> diff?
>
>
>
>
> Nic Ferrier
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>
