Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords
Date
Msg-id 10332.997981605@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> I don't follow this argument.  You added a config option that toggles
> whether to use the old crypt(3) method or the new md5 method.

?? If the config option works like that, I think it's wrong.  There
shouldn't *be* a config option, unless it's one that turns off MD5
because the platform hasn't got int64 support.  An MD5-enabled server
or client must still be able to do crypt too, in order to speak to
older clients or servers.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords