Re: What releases should the jdbc driver support? Was: - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

I don't have any problem with only supporting the last 2 versions. The
rational is that: many bugs get fixed along with features so it behooves
people to upgrade their servers anyway. There is no barrier to upgrading
other than time and effort.

Dave
On Thu, 2002-09-12 at 12:51, Barry Lind wrote:
> We have been trying to remain backwardly compatible back to 7.0.  But as
> you point out some non-backwardly compatible things have been added.  It
> is possible to use outer-joins for 7.1 and greater and not use them for
> 7.0 (i.e. if (connection.haveMinimumServerVersion("7.1")) { do join
> stuff } else { do existing logic } ).  But before doing that does anyone
> have an opinion on how far back the driver should support server versions?
>
> I would suggest we have a policy of supporting the current and two
> previous versions.  Since the current production version is 7.2 that
> means supporting 7.0 and 7.1 in the 7.2 driver, and supporting 7.1 and
> 7.2 in the 7.3 driver.  The problem with this is that we generally don't
> backport fixes to previous releases, so if someone found a bug in the
> 7.2 driver and was running on a 7.0 database they wouldn't be able to
> easily get a fix since we would fix it in the 7.3 version which wouldn't
> support 7.0.  If we decide on a policy I think it is then a good idea to
> have the driver error when connecting to a database version that isn't
> supported.
>
> thanks,
> --Barry
>
>
> Panu Outinen wrote:
>  > At 10:00 12.9.2002 -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
>  >
>  >> Panu,
>  >>
>  >> The getIndexInfo uses an outer join which won't be backward compatible?
>  >> I did apply the getTables patch and will commit soon, can you modify the
>  >> getIndexInfo part?
>  >
>  >
>  > Well, both getTables() and getIndexInfo() part of my patch need the
>  > 'outer join' functionality. And e.g. getColumns() uses 'outer join'
>  > always in current code!
>  >
>  > So how far backward compatible does it need to be nowadays ? I mean 7.3
>  > version of Postgresql is already coming, isn't 7.1.x enough ?
>  >
>  >   - Panu
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >> Dave
>  >> On Sun, 2002-09-08 at 14:18, Panu Outinen wrote:
>  >> > Hi !!
>  >> >
>  >> > The following patch speeds up the queries in getTables() and
>  >> > getIndexInfo(). It replaces the looping of queries with a simple join
>  >> > operation. Patch is against the current CVS (2002-09-08).
>  >> >
>  >> >    - Panu
>  >> >
>  >> > PS. Tested against PostgreSQL 7.1.2 and PostgreSQL 7.2.1 databases
>  >> >
>  >> >
>  >>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >>
>  >> >
>  >> > --- AbstractJdbc1DatabaseMetaData.java.org    Sun Sep  8 20:58:57 2002
>  >> > +++ AbstractJdbc1DatabaseMetaData.java        Sun Sep  8 21:02:58 2002
>  >> > @@ -1836,7 +1836,9 @@
>  >> >               f[4] = new Field(connection, "REMARKS", iVarcharOid,
>  >> NAME_SIZE);
>  >> >
>  >> >               // Now form the query
>  >> > -             StringBuffer sql = new StringBuffer("select
>  >> relname,oid,relkind from
>  >> > pg_class where (");
>  >> > +             StringBuffer sql = new
>  >> > StringBuffer(connection.haveMinimumServerVersion("7.2") ?
>  >> > +               "select
>  >> relname,oid,relkind,obj_description(oid,'pg_class') from
>  >> > pg_class where (" :
>  >> > +               "select c.relname,c.oid,c.relkind,d.description from
>  >> pg_class c
>  >> > left outer join pg_description d on (d.objoid = c.oid) where (" );
>  >> >
>  >> >               boolean notFirst = false;
>  >> >               for (int i = 0;i < types.length;i++)
>  >> > @@ -1863,24 +1865,6 @@
>  >> >               while (r.next())
>  >> >               {
>  >> >                       byte[][] tuple = new byte[5][0];
>  >> > -
>  >> > -                     // Fetch the description for the table (if any)
>  >> > -                     String getDescriptionStatement =
>  >> > -
>  >> connection.haveMinimumServerVersion("7.2") ?
>  >> > -                             "select obj_description(" +
>  >> r.getInt(2) + ",'pg_class')" :
>  >> > -                             "select description from
>  >> pg_description where objoid=" + r.getInt(2);
>  >> > -
>  >> > -                     java.sql.ResultSet dr =
>  >> connection.ExecSQL(getDescriptionStatement);
>  >> > -
>  >> > -                     byte remarks[] = null;
>  >> > -
>  >> > -                     if
>  >> (((AbstractJdbc1ResultSet)dr).getTupleCount() == 1)
>  >> > -                     {
>  >> > -                             dr.next();
>  >> > -                             remarks = dr.getBytes(1);
>  >> > -                     }
>  >> > -                     dr.close();
>  >> > -
>  >> >                       String relKind;
>  >> >                       switch (r.getBytes(3)[0])
>  >> >                       {
>  >> > @@ -1911,7 +1895,7 @@
>  >> >                       tuple[1] = null;                // Schema name
>  >> >                       tuple[2] = r.getBytes(1);       // Table name
>  >> >                       tuple[3] = (relKind == null) ? null :
>  >> relKind.getBytes();       // Table type
>  >> > -                     tuple[4] = remarks;             // Remarks
>  >> > +                     tuple[4] = r.getBytes(4);       //Remarks
>  >> >                       v.addElement(tuple);
>  >> >               }
>  >> >               r.close();
>  >> > @@ -3096,8 +3080,8 @@
>  >> >
> "x.indkey, " +
>  >> >
>  >> "c.reltuples, " +
>  >> >
>  >> "c.relpages, " +
>  >> > -
>  >> "x.indexrelid " +
>  >> > -                                                        "FROM
>  >> pg_index x, pg_class c, pg_class i, pg_am a " +
>  >> > +
> "b.attname " +
>  >> > +                                                        "FROM
>  >> pg_index x left outer join pg_attribute b on (x.indexrelid
>  >> > = b.attrelid), pg_class c, pg_class i, pg_am a " +
>  >> >                                                          "WHERE
>  >> ((c.relname = '" + tableName.toLowerCase() + "') " +
>  >> >                                                          " AND
>  >> (c.oid = x.indrelid) " +
>  >> >                                                          " AND
>  >> (i.oid = x.indexrelid) " +
>  >> > @@ -3118,7 +3102,6 @@
>  >> >                       {
>  >> >                               columnOrdinals[o++] =
>  >> Integer.parseInt(stok.nextToken());
>  >> >                       }
>  >> > -                     java.sql.ResultSet columnNameRS =
>  >> connection.ExecSQL("select a.attname
>  >> > FROM pg_attribute a WHERE a.attrelid = " + r.getInt(9));
>  >> >                       for (int i = 0; i < columnOrdinals.length; i++)
>  >> >                       {
>  >> >                               byte [] [] tuple = new byte [13] [];
>  >> > @@ -3134,14 +3117,7 @@
>  >> >
> Integer.toString(java.sql.DatabaseMetaData.tableIndexHashed).getBytes()
>  >> > :
>  >> >
> Integer.toString(java.sql.DatabaseMetaData.tableIndexOther).getBytes();
>  >> >                               tuple[7] = Integer.toString(i +
>  >> 1).getBytes();
>  >> > -                             if (columnNameRS.next())
>  >> > -                             {
>  >> > -                                     tuple[8] =
>  >> columnNameRS.getBytes(1);
>  >> > -                             }
>  >> > -                             else
>  >> > -                             {
>  >> > -                                     tuple[8] = "".getBytes();
>  >> > -                             }
>  >> > +                             tuple[8] = r.getBytes(9);
>  >> >                               tuple[9] = null;  // sort sequence ???
>  >> >                               tuple[10] = r.getBytes(7);      //
>  >> inexact
>  >> >                               tuple[11] = r.getBytes(8);
>  >> >
>  >> >
>  >> >
>  >> >
>  >> >
>  >> >
>  >> > ---------------------------(end of
>  >> broadcast)---------------------------
>  >> > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>  >> > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
>  >> > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>  >> >
>  >> >
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>  >> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
>  >
>  >
>  >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
>     (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
>
>