Re: - pg_dump issues - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Oliver Elphick
Subject Re: - pg_dump issues
Date
Msg-id 1031780444.2066.596.camel@linda
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re:  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: - pg_dump issues
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 21:19, Tom Lane wrote:
> In the meantime, I think that we shouldn't mess with pg_dump's basically
> OID-order-driven dump ordering.  It works in normal cases, and adding
> arbitrary rules to it to fix one corner case is likely to accomplish
> little except breaking other corner cases.

I can see that Lamar and I are going to have major problems dealing with
users who fall over these problems.  There are some things that simply
cannot be handled automatically, such as user-written functions that
return opaque.  Then there are issues of ordering; and finally the fact
that we need to use the new pg_dump with the old binaries to get a
useful dump.

It seems to me that I shall have to make the new package such that it
can exist alongside the old one for a time, or else possibly separate
7.3 pg_dump and pg_dumpall into a separate package.  It is going to be a
total pain!

-- 
Oliver Elphick                                Oliver.Elphick@lfix.co.uk
Isle of Wight, UK                            
http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839  932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
========================================   "I am crucified with Christ; nevertheless I live; yet      not I, but Christ
livethin me; and the life which I      now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son      of God, who loved me,
andgave himself for me."                                               Galatians 2:20 
 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re:
Next
From: Laurette Cisneros
Date:
Subject: timestamp column default changed?