Re: - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Oliver Elphick
Subject Re:
Date
Msg-id 1031695680.32359.862.camel@linda
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re:  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re:  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re:  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2002-09-10 at 18:38, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> I am confused.  This wording seems fine to me.

The confusion was mine.  Of course, pg_dump doesn't create the
database.  I was mixing it up with pg_dumpall.

However, there is a problem in that recent changes have made it quite
likely that an upgrade will fail and will requre the dump script to be
edited.  There are some issues in pg_dump / pg_dumpall that need
addressing before final release.

-- 
Oliver Elphick                                Oliver.Elphick@lfix.co.uk
Isle of Wight, UK                            
http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839  932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
========================================   "Draw near to God and he will draw near to you.       Cleanse your hands,
yousinners; and purify your       hearts, you double minded."       James 4:8 
 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: problem with new autocommit config parameter and jdbc
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: