Re: Performance Tuning / RAM Usage - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Oliver Elphick
Subject Re: Performance Tuning / RAM Usage
Date
Msg-id 1030548203.22473.125.camel@linda
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Performance Tuning / RAM Usage  (Andrew Sullivan <andrew@libertyrms.info>)
Responses Re: Performance Tuning / RAM Usage  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 15:55, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 10:40:46AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Andrew Sullivan <andrew@libertyrms.info> writes:
> > > I know that the Debian package does not -- or at least didn't used to
> > > -- check for deadlocks at all,
> >
> > [blinks]  What?
>
> Hmm.  I just checked my home box (where I have the Debian package
> installed), and it seems no longer to be the case.  There's no entry
> for deadlock_timeout, so the default (1000, IIRC) is what gets used,
> I guess.  I have a dim memory, however, of a comment in the old
> config file to the effect that the (Debian) default setting of
> deadlock_timeout was infinite, i.e. effectively no deadlock checking.
>
> Hmm.  I just checked an ancient box with 6.5 on it, and it's not
> there.  Maybe I'm on crack.

I fear so :-)

I'm sure I've never made any such change to the package.

--
Oliver Elphick                                Oliver.Elphick@lfix.co.uk
Isle of Wight, UK
http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839  932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
                 ========================================
     "Use hospitality one to another without grudging."
                                   I Peter 4:9


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: stupid Q regarding "UPDATE waiting"
Next
From: Dan Ostrowski
Date:
Subject: Noobie Questions...