Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> writes:
> I noticed that a couple of the functions added by commit 34694ec use
> "int16" instead of "uint16" for the infomask parameter. I don't think
> there are any live bugs here, but IMHO we should at least fix this for v19
> to help prevent future problems.
> Assuming there is agreement on this change, any thoughts on back-patching?
+1 for changing, but -1 for back-patching. Unless you're itching
for reasons to update .abi-compliance-history. But if there's no
live bug, that seems like make-work.
regards, tom lane
