On Tue, 2002-08-20 at 10:21, Tom Lane wrote:
> Rod Taylor <rbt@zort.ca> writes:
> > The issue with finding and removing foreign key constraints is no longer
> > an issue, so please apply the attached.
>
> I do not like adding a system-table index just for the convenience of
> this one not-very-time-critical function. Please rewrite the patch
> without that.
> BTW, if you are only reading the table and not writing it, the correct
> lock type to get is AccessShareLock, not RowExclusiveLock.
Corrected both of the above.
