Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API
Date
Msg-id 10293.1405625886@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API  (Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>)
Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> I haven't followed this at all, but I just skimmed over it and noticed
> the CustomPlanMarkPos thingy; apologies if this has been discussed
> before.  It seems a bit odd to me; why isn't it sufficient to have a
> boolean flag in regular CustomPlan to indicate that it supports
> mark/restore?

Yeah, I thought that was pretty bogus too, but it's well down the
list of issues that were there last time I looked at this ...
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Portability issues in TAP tests
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUFFER_LOCK_EXCLUSIVE is used in ginbuildempty().