Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Copeland
Subject Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations
Date
Msg-id 1028521299.8190.751.camel@mouse.copelandconsulting.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Sat, 2002-08-03 at 21:01, Tom Lane wrote:
> * Local bufmgr semantics are twiddled to reflect this reality --- in
> particular, data in local buffers can be held across transactions, there
> is no end-of-transaction write (much less fsync).  A TEMP table that
> isn't too large might never touch disk at all.

Curious.  Is there currently such a criteria?  What exactly constitutes
"too large"?

Greg

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks