Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?
Date
Msg-id 1028344.1605769439@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes:
> Is there a feature code? I skimmed the standard and non-standard tables in
> our appendix and couldn’t find this in either.

a19d9d3c4 seems to have thought it was S151.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?
Next
From: "tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: [Patch] Optimize dropping of relation buffers using dlist