Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From J. R. Nield
Subject Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations
Date
Msg-id 1028327051.1264.46.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations  ("Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM>)
List pgsql-hackers
Are you sure this is true for all ports? And if so, why would it be
cheaper for the kernel to do it in its buffer manager, compared to us
doing it in ours? This just seems bogus to rely on. Does anyone know
what POSIX has to say about this? 

On Fri, 2002-08-02 at 18:01, Mikheev, Vadim wrote:
> > > How do you get atomic block copies otherwise?
> > 
> > Eh?  The kernel does that for you, as long as you're reading the
> > same-size blocks that the backends are writing, no?
> 
> Good point.
> 
> Vadim
> 
-- 
J. R. Nield
jrnield@usol.com





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Mikheev, Vadim"
Date:
Subject: Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: Build errors with current CVS