Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Brett Schwarz
Subject Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks
Date
Msg-id 1028290396.30577.968.camel@thor
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2002-08-02 at 09:28, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 10:39:47AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >
> > > Actually, plpgsql is pretty expensive too.  The thing to be benchmarking
> > > is applications of plain old built-in-C functions and operators.
> >
> > I thought part of the justification for this was for the OpenACS
> > guys; don't they write everything in TCL?
> 
> Nope, the OpenACS stuff relies on plpgsql functions ... the 'TCL' is the
> web pages themselves, vs using something like PHP ... I may be wrong, but
> I do not believe any of the functions are in TCL ...
> 

Nope, some are written in Tcl. Most are in plpgsql, mainly I believe so
that the port between Oracle and PG is easier.
   --brett

> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
>     (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
-- 
Brett Schwarz
brett_schwarz AT yahoo.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "J. R. Nield"
Date:
Subject: Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations
Next
From: "Sander Steffann"
Date:
Subject: Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?