Re: Too many clients to Postgresql server - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Robert Treat
Subject Re: Too many clients to Postgresql server
Date
Msg-id 1027003702.22899.36.camel@camel
Whole thread Raw
In response to Too many clients to Postgresql server  (Siva Kumar <siva@leatherlink.net>)
Responses Re: Too many clients to Postgresql server
List pgsql-general
Since you don't have the ability to bump up the maximum number of
connections, your best bet is to switch to pg_connect. The implications
would be that each page load will require a connection to the server,
but unless you are doing multiple database *connections* per page, this
impact is usually insignificant.

Robert Treat

On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 15:09, Siva Kumar wrote:
> This message uses a character set that is not supported by the Internet
> Service.  To view the original message content,  open the attached
> message. If the text doesn't display correctly, save the attachment to
> disk, and then open it using a viewer that can display the original
> character set. <<message.txt>>
> ----
>
> We have a website using postgresql and php, hosted in a shared server. The
> settings for the maximum connections allowed is 32.
>
> I have used the persistent connection function pg_pconnect for all the
> database connections. For the past one week I have started getting the
> maximum number of clients reached message now and then. Today one of my
> customers also called up with the same problem.
>
> The question is, should I change the way of connecting to the server to
> pg_connect? What will be the implications? Otherwise, how can the persistent
> connections be closed down?
>
> Thanks and best regards,
>
>
> Siva Kumar



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: Basic replication query
Next
From: Thomas Beutin
Date:
Subject: Re: Too many clients to Postgresql server