On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 18:12, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Yes, WITHOUT OIDs just prevents the oid counter from incrementing as
> quickly and perhaps rolling over. In 7.3 I think WITHOUT OID may save
> storage so I am going to avoid documenting it at this point.
Thanks for the answers, folks (I added a docnote pointing to this thread
so others may not need to ask the same question again).
Remaining question: if OIDs are optional for normal tables, why are they
created per default? Mandated by SQL? Backward compatibility?
cheers
-- vbi
--
secure email with gpg http://fortytwo.ch/gpg
