Re: Memo on dropping practices - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Rod Taylor
Subject Re: Memo on dropping practices
Date
Msg-id 1026528721.30427.69.camel@jester
Whole thread Raw
In response to Memo on dropping practices  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Memo on dropping practices
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 15:17, Tom Lane wrote:
> Now that the pg_depend mechanism is mostly in there, it is no longer
> a good idea to delete things directly (for example, by calling
> heap_drop_with_catalog or even just heap_delete'ing a catalog tuple).

I noticed that SERIAL sequences aren't dropping with the application of
the patch.

Was this intentional?

I know I didn't have a way of carrying sequence information across a
dump (yet), but didn't think it would hurt to have.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Memo on dropping practices
Next
From: Rod Taylor
Date:
Subject: Unique and Primary Key Constraints