> all values, drop the old col). So, there is no reason why this new
> attisdropped field shouldn't allow us to implement a full ALTER TABLE/SET
> TYPE sort of feature - cool huh?
I've not looked in a while, but the column rename code did not account
for issues in foreign keys, etc. Those should be easier to ferret out
soon, but may not be so nice to change yet.
It should also be noted that an ALTER TABLE / SET TYPE implemented with
the above idea with run into the 2x diskspace issue as well as take
quite a while to process.
