On Wed, 2002-07-03 at 08:20, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > Of course, a shared memory system probably is going to either do it
> > sequentailly or have its own index issues, so I don't see a huge
> > advantage to going to shared memory, and I do see extra code and a queue
> > limit.
>
> Is a shared memory implementation going to play silly buggers with the Win32
> port?
Perhaps this is a good place to introduce anonymous mmap ?
Is there a way to grow anonymous mmap on demand ?
----------------
Hannu
