Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Re: [GENERAL] inconsistent behaviour of set-returning functions in sub-query with random() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Re: [GENERAL] inconsistent behaviour of set-returning functions in sub-query with random()
Date
Msg-id 10246.1475016499@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] inconsistent behaviour of set-returning functions in sub-query with random()  (Tom van Tilburg <tom.van.tilburg@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Tom van Tilburg <tom.van.tilburg@gmail.com> writes:
> Good to know and I agree that it is not an urgent case.
> I think this practice might be more common in the POSTGIS community where
> there are plenty of set-returning-functions used in this way. My use was
> taking a random sample of a pointcloud distrubution.

Fix pushed to HEAD only.  Thanks for the report!

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: LLVM Address Sanitizer (ASAN) and valgrind support
Next
From: Vitaly Burovoy
Date:
Subject: Re: Detect supported SET parameters when pg_restore is run