Re: Re: floating point representation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Re: floating point representation
Date
Msg-id 10244.982768753@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: floating point representation  (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au> writes:
> The other issues, like what is sent to psql & via interfaces like odbc
> (currently text) should be application/DBA based and setable on a
> per-attribute basis. eg. some applications want 1.0000 because the data
> came from a piece of hardware with a know error, and 1.0000 means 1.0000+/-
> 0.00005 etc. Maybe this is just an argument for a new 'number with error'
> type...

FWIW, there is a number-with-error type in contrib/seg ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: beta5 ...
Next
From: Chris Storah
Date:
Subject: low priority postmaster threads?