Re: Again, sorry, caching. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Neil Conway
Subject Re: Again, sorry, caching.
Date
Msg-id 1016587699.22270.37.camel@jiro
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Again, sorry, caching.  (F Harvell <fharvell@fts.net>)
Responses Re: Again, sorry, caching.
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2002-03-19 at 19:20, F Harvell wrote:
> I feel that the caching should be SQL transparent.  If it is
> implemented reasonably well, the performance gain should be pretty
> much universal.

Well, the simple query cache scheme that is currently being proposed
would use a byte-by-byte comparison of the incoming query. I think the
consensus is that for a lot of workloads, this would be a bad idea.

Cheers,

Neil

-- 
Neil Conway <neilconway@rogers.com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: F Harvell
Date:
Subject: Re: Again, sorry, caching.
Next
From: mlw
Date:
Subject: Re: Again, sorry, caching.