Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Neil Conway
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item
Date
Msg-id 1014613803.7682.118.camel@jiro
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
On Sun, 2002-02-24 at 22:34, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> You have a good point with pg_dump.  Can I remove the use of the equals
> in there?  Seems safe to me.  However, it does prevent us from loading
> newer pgdumps into older database, which seems like a pain.

AFAIK, no effort is made to ensure that dump files produced by a current
version of pg_dump will restore properly into older databases. From what
I can tell, the odds of this happening successfully are slim to none...

Cheers,

Neil

--
Neil Conway <neilconway@rogers.com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC


pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Janardhana Reddy
Date:
Subject: WAL Performance Improvements
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL Performance Improvements