Re: elog() proposal - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Karl DeBisschop
Subject Re: elog() proposal
Date
Msg-id 1014554538.24684.1.camel@miles.debisschop.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: elog() proposal  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 2002-02-23 at 12:04, Tom Lane wrote:
> Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org> writes:
> > I'm with Peter on this one; let's find another more neutral name.
> 
> Proposals then?  What's been used or bandied about so far are
> "REALLYFATAL" (yuck, even though I take the blame for it).
> "STOP" (Vadim put this in, but I object to it as being too vague;
>        it's not at all obvious that it's worse than FATAL).
> "FATALALL" (also yuck).
> 
> Surely we can find something that's short, memorable, and clearly
> a notch more fatal than FATAL.

PANIC ?

-- 
Karl DeBisschop <kdebisschop@alert.infoplease.com>
The Learning Network / Reference
www.learningnetwork.com / www.infoplease.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Outstanding patches analysis
Next
From: "Archana Bharatee"
Date:
Subject: decode()