Re: [Fwd: Re: pgaccess connection problems] - Mailing list pgsql-novice

From Oliver Elphick
Subject Re: [Fwd: Re: pgaccess connection problems]
Date
Msg-id 1012373930.17978.43.camel@linda
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Fwd: Re: pgaccess connection problems]  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-novice
On Tue, 2002-01-29 at 23:57, Tom Lane wrote:
> Not sure that that's 100% true.  If you tell any of these programs to
> connect to host "localhost", they will certainly go via TCP --- and
> hence fail if the postmaster hasn't got -i.  But on at least some of
> the GUI interfaces, putting an empty entry in the "host" dialog box
> will result in a Unix-socket connection not a TCP connection to
> localhost.  (The Unix-socket method is what psql and pgdump use by
> default.)  For that, you don't need -i.
>
> Dunno if that applies to pgaccess, but try it.

It does.

--
Oliver Elphick                                Oliver.Elphick@lfix.co.uk
Isle of Wight                              http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839  932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C

     "The Lord knoweth how to deliver the godly out of
      temptations, and to reserve the unjust unto the day of
      judgment to be punished;"            II Peter 2:9

Attachment

pgsql-novice by date:

Previous
From: Sharon Cowling
Date:
Subject: Function Problem
Next
From: Chris Thompson
Date:
Subject: Transactions