Re: pg_stat_progress_create_index vs. parallel index builds - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tomas Vondra
Subject Re: pg_stat_progress_create_index vs. parallel index builds
Date
Msg-id 0fe69bec-95b7-f589-6d91-00320b1d59f9@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_stat_progress_create_index vs. parallel index builds  (Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_stat_progress_create_index vs. parallel index builds
List pgsql-hackers
On 6/2/21 4:54 PM, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 15:23, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
 >
> After looking at it a bit more, it seems like a solution was actually
> easier than I'd expected. PFA a prototype (unvalidated, but
> check-world -ed) patch that would add these subphases of progress
> reporting, which can be backpatched down to 12.
> 

Nice. I gave it a try on the database I'm experimenting with, and it 
seems to be working fine. Please add it to the next CF.

regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joel Jacobson"
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for CREATE MODULE?
Next
From: Matthias van de Meent
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_stat_progress_create_index vs. parallel index builds