Re: Better, consistent instrumentation for postgreSQL using a similar API as Oracle - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Laurenz Albe
Subject Re: Better, consistent instrumentation for postgreSQL using a similar API as Oracle
Date
Msg-id 0eec105c66409053f3e10f6d216c91600708c040.camel@cybertec.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Better, consistent instrumentation for postgreSQL using a similar API as Oracle  (Franck Pachot <pg.franck@pachot.net>)
List pgsql-performance
On Mon, 2021-10-11 at 00:09 +0200, Franck Pachot wrote:
> And people will dislike it because it mentions Oracle.

I don't think so.
While "Oracle has it" is not a good enough reason for a feature, it
is certainly no counter-indication.

> Or people will dislike it because they think this should be reserved to commercial forks.

That is conceivable, but I think most vendors would prefer to have
that in standard PostgreSQL rather than having to maintain it on
their own.

> Or because it may introduce too much dependency on the OS.

That is possible.  But I think gettimeofday(2) is portable enough.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe




pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Franck Pachot
Date:
Subject: Re: Better, consistent instrumentation for postgreSQL using a similar API as Oracle
Next
From: Ashkil Dighin
Date:
Subject: Lock contention high