On 3/3/26 5:13 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2026 at 04:39:43AM +0100, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
>> Shouldn't the patch have used repalloc_array()? If the code had done so in
>> the first place the bug would never have happened.
>
> I was considering that first. However, after looked at the
> MemoryContextAlloc() and the inconsistency that repalloc_array() was
> bringing, I have turned the thought away.
Ah, makes sense but then the question is if we should make
MemoryContextAlloc() more consistent with palloc() but that is a bigger
question than just this small bugfix.
Andreas
