Re: Let's play bash the search engine - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Thomas H.
Subject Re: Let's play bash the search engine
Date
Msg-id 0d1701c72395$0a9d03b0$6601a8c0@iwing
Whole thread Raw
In response to Let's play bash the search engine  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Let's play bash the search engine  (Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>)
List pgsql-general
>> http://search.postgresql.org/search?q=HAVING
>> says  "An error occured while searching."
>
> I bet HAVING is a stop-word, so actual message is 'NOTICE:  query contains
> only stopword(s) or doesn't contain lexeme(s), ignored'
>
> I think we should add to pg_dict dictionary line
>
> having having

just a though... wouldn't it make sense for a documentation search index to
*not* have stop words at all? potentially every word that is being searched
for could be contained in a query example, code piece etc and thus seems
important to me... for example keywords like AND, OR etc.

- thomas



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Let's play bash the search engine
Next
From: Oleg Bartunov
Date:
Subject: Re: Let's play bash the search engine