Re: Proposal for internal Numeric to Uint64 conversion function. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Proposal for internal Numeric to Uint64 conversion function.
Date
Msg-id 0d0dd4ec-d446-f4f2-ab5a-7e999f0a468c@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal for internal Numeric to Uint64 conversion function.  (Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Proposal for internal Numeric to Uint64 conversion function.
List pgsql-hackers
On 22.04.22 14:26, Amul Sul wrote:
> Yes, I think we can do cleanup to some extent.  Attaching the
> following patches that first intend to remove DirectFunctionCall as
> much as possible:

Do you have any data that supports removing DirectionFunctionCall() 
invocations?  I suppose some performance benefit could be expected, or 
what do you have in mind?




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Refactor construct_array() and deconstruct_array() for built-in types
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Configuration Parameter/GUC value validation hook