Re: Index usage for elem-contained-by-const-range clauses - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Steele
Subject Re: Index usage for elem-contained-by-const-range clauses
Date
Msg-id 0cb8d6c6-7953-beeb-8240-3007e59798bc@pgmasters.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Index usage for elem-contained-by-const-range clauses  (Pritam Baral <pritam@pritambaral.com>)
Responses Re: Index usage for elem-contained-by-const-range clauses  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Pritam,

On 3/17/17 5:41 PM, Pritam Baral wrote:
>
> So sorry. I'm attaching the correct version of the original with this,
> in case you want to test the limited implementation, because I still
> have to go through Tom's list of suggestions.
>
> BTW, the patch is for applying on top of REL9_6_2, and while I
> suspect it may work on master too, I haven't tested it since the
> original submission (Feb 23).
>
>> Also, I noticed that patch haven't regression tests.  Some mention of
>> this optimization in docs is also nice to have.  > > ------ >
>> Alexander Korotkov > Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
>> > The Russian Postgres Company

This thread has been idle for a week.  Please respond and/or post a new 
patch by 2017-03-28 00:00 AoE (UTC-12) or this submission will be marked 
"Returned with Feedback".

Thanks,
-- 
-David
david@pgmasters.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: logical replication apply to run with sync commit off by default
Next
From: Marko Tiikkaja
Date:
Subject: Logical replication SnapBuildInitalSnapshot spelling