Re: Two small patches for the isolationtester lexer - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Gustafsson
Subject Re: Two small patches for the isolationtester lexer
Date
Msg-id 0E806A3B-1FA2-4D18-99DA-80091B910F2F@yesql.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Two small patches for the isolationtester lexer  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> On 01 Mar 2018, at 06:01, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:

>> I agree, patch 0002 was broken and the correct fix is a much bigger project -
>> one too big for me to tackle right now (but hopefully at some point in the near
>> future).  Thanks for the review of it though!
>
> OK.  I'm going to mark this commitfest entry closed, since the other patch
> is in and this one needs a good bit more work.  Please start a new thread,
> or at least a new CF entry, if you do more work in this area.

I absolutely agree, thanks!

cheers ./daniel

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: RFC: Add 'taint' field to pg_control.
Next
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: RFC: Add 'taint' field to pg_control.