Re: UNION ALL has higher cost than inheritance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David E. Wheeler
Subject Re: UNION ALL has higher cost than inheritance
Date
Msg-id 0CC179F2-A5BF-433C-9D7E-E8AC032EEACA@kineticode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: UNION ALL has higher cost than inheritance  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Oct 21, 2010, at 2:17 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

> The oversight here is that we don't use appendrel planning for
> a top-level UNION ALL construct.  That didn't use to matter,
> because you always got the same stupid Append plan either way.
> Now it seems like we ought to have some more intelligence for the
> top-level SetOp case.  I smell some code refactoring coming up.

Does it smell like chicken?

Best,

David



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Why do we have a database specification in .pgpass?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_filedump binary for CentOS