Re: DOCS - pg_walsummary typo? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Chao Li
Subject Re: DOCS - pg_walsummary typo?
Date
Msg-id 0CBD1035-6278-40B5-8DB2-A947F6EC6CB7@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to DOCS - pg_walsummary typo?  (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

> On Feb 16, 2026, at 11:39, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I found what seems to be a typo in the pg_walsummary description. I
> guess that "with" was supposed to say "within", but IMO just "in" is
> fine.
>
> BEFORE
> These binary files are found with the pg_wal/summaries subdirectory of
> the data directory...
>
> SUGGESTION
> These binary files are found in the pg_wal/summaries subdirectory of
> the data directory...
>
>
> PSA patch for the same.
>
> ======
> Kind Regards,
> Peter Smith.
> Fujitsu Australia.
> <v1-0001-DOCS-pg_walsummary-fix-typo.patch>

I would guess “with” was a typo of “within”. I agree with changing “with” to “in”, alternatively, “within” and “under”
mayalso work there. 

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/







pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Chao Li
Date:
Subject: Re: Improve OAuth discovery logging
Next
From: Tender Wang
Date:
Subject: Re: MERGE behavior with REPEATABLE READ isolation level