>> The problem is in idea, not in performance.
Oh, I think we both agree on that! ;-D
This is why I didn't post any EXPLAINs or anything like that. I thought the
problem was in the entire method of how to best zero in on the set of
records best suited for closer analysis by my phrase-matching function.
Since you asked about an EXPLAIN ANALYZE, I put together some results for
for you. I added a pg_trgm index to the table to show the performance of
GiST indexes, and did another based on exclusively on similarity(). But I
don't think that you will be surprised by what you see.
As you say, the problem is in the idea - but no matter what, I need to be
able to match phrases that will have all sorts of erratic abbreviations and
misspellings - and I have to do it at very high speeds.
I would appreciate any suggestions you might have.
Carlo
select similarity('veterans''s affairs', name) as sim, name
from institution
where name % 'veterans''s affairs'
order by sim desc
Sort (cost=4068.21..4071.83 rows=1446 width=23) (actual
time=4154.962..4155.006 rows=228 loops=1)
Sort Key: similarity('veterans''s affairs'::text, (name)::text)
-> Bitmap Heap Scan on institution (cost=75.07..3992.31 rows=1446
width=23) (actual time=4152.825..4154.754 rows=228 loops=1)
Recheck Cond: ((name)::text % 'veterans''s affairs'::text)
-> Bitmap Index Scan on institution_name_trgm_idx
(cost=0.00..74.71 rows=1446 width=0) (actual time=4152.761..4152.761
rows=228 loops=1)
Index Cond: ((name)::text % 'veterans''s affairs'::text)
Total runtime: 4155.127 ms
select name
from institution
where
similarity('veterans''s affairs', name) > 0.5
order by similarity('veterans''s affairs', name) > 0.5
Sort (cost=142850.08..144055.17 rows=482036 width=23) (actual
time=12603.745..12603.760 rows=77 loops=1)
Sort Key: (similarity('veterans''s affairs'::text, (name)::text) >
0.5::double precision)
-> Seq Scan on institution (cost=0.00..97348.81 rows=482036 width=23)
(actual time=2032.439..12603.370 rows=77 loops=1)
Filter: (similarity('veterans''s affairs'::text, (name)::text) >
0.5::double precision)
Total runtime: 12603.818 ms
