Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

RE: setPortNumber() should not be used when useing connectionfail-over feature with PGConnectionPoolDataSource? - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Okano, Naoki
Subject RE: setPortNumber() should not be used when useing connectionfail-over feature with PGConnectionPoolDataSource?
Date
Msg-id 0B4917A40C80E34BBEC4BE1A7A9AB7E2A844DF@g01jpexmbkw05
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: setPortNumber() should not be used when useing connectionfail-over feature with PGConnectionPoolDataSource?  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
Responses Re: setPortNumber() should not be used when useing connectionfail-over feature with PGConnectionPoolDataSource?  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
Tree view 
Dave Cramer [mailto:pg@fastcrypt.com] wrote:
> Pretty sure this was never intended to work.
>
>
> That said if you can provide a pull request we can look at implementing it.

Thank you for your reply!
I understand it does not work as intended.
So, I try to implement it and will send a pull request.

Regards,
Okano Naoki

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: setPortNumber() should not be used when useing connectionfail-over feature with PGConnectionPoolDataSource?
Next
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: setPortNumber() should not be used when useing connectionfail-over feature with PGConnectionPoolDataSource?